Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Avon 5 (13 / 2) - Amherst Steele 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 61 - 7 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Avon | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Amherst Steele |
Beavercreek 5 (10 / 3) - Wayne 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beavercreek | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wayne |
Beechcroft 5 (6 / 5) - Eastmoor Academy 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 47 - 16 O.o.F.: 4-2-1-3-0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Beechcroft | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Eastmoor Academy |
Bellefontaine 5 (12 / 5) - Urbana 0 (0 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 63 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellefontaine | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Urbana |
Bexley 3 (14 / 8) - Columbus Academy 2 (14 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 54 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bexley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Columbus Academy |
Bexley-B 5 (2 / 3) - Worthington Christian 0 (6 / 12) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 74 - 28 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-1-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bexley-B | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Worthington Christian |
Big Walnut 5 (12 / 5) - Dublin Scioto 0 (2 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 55 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Big Walnut | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Scioto |
Centerville-B 5 (9 / 4) - Little Miami 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 62 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Centerville-B | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Little Miami |
Chillicothe 3 (13 / 3) - Hillsboro 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 46 - 36 O.o.F.: 3-5-1-2-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Chillicothe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hillsboro |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (13 / 2) - West Geauga 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 49 - 17 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
West Geauga |
Dayton Christian 5 - Carlisle 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 61 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dayton Christian | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Carlisle |
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Canal Winchester 0 (3 / 12) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Delaware Hayes | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Canal Winchester |
Dublin Coffman 3 (9 / 6) - Upper Arlington 2 (7 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 51 - 34 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Coffman | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Upper Arlington |
Gahanna 5 (13 / 3) - Grove City 0 (5 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 65% # Games: 64 - 35 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Gahanna | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Grove City |
Greenville 5 - Piqua 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 61 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Greenville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Piqua |
Hawken 3 (8 / 1) - Westlake 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 38 - 41 O.o.F.: 3-1-2-4-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hawken | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westlake |
Hilliard Darby 3 (3 / 8) - Thomas Worthington 2 (2 / 17) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 52 - 47 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hilliard Darby | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Thomas Worthington |
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - Nordonia 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hudson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Nordonia |
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - St. Edward 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hudson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
St. Edward |
Jonathan Alder 4 (16 / 3) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 59 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Jonathan Alder | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kenton Ridge |
Kettering Fairmont 3 (6 / 4) - Archbishop Alter 2 (4 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 46 - 47 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Kettering Fairmont | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Archbishop Alter |
Loveland 4 (9 / 9) - Kings 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 54 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Loveland | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Kings |
Marysville 5 (9 / 4) - Olentangy Berlin 0 (7 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 57 - 29 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Marysville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Olentangy Berlin |
Mason 5 (8 / 6) - Lakota East 0 (10 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Mason | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakota East |
Miami Valley School 3 (4 / 3) - Legacy Christian Academy 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 54 - 35 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Miami Valley School | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Legacy Christian Academy |
Milton-Union 3 - Chaminade-Julienne 2 (12 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 42 - 38 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Milton-Union | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chaminade-Julienne |
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Pickerington North 0 (5 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
New Albany | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Pickerington North |
Newark 5 (8 / 3) - Groveport 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 36 - 11 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Newark | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Groveport |
North Canton Hoover 5 (2 / 1) - Copley 0 (6 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 62 - 25 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
North Canton Hoover | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Copley |
Northwestern 3 (9 / 5) - London 2 (7 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 49 - 32 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Northwestern | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
London |
Oakwood 5 (14 / 2) - Waynesville 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Oakwood | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Waynesville |
Olentangy 3 (7 / 6) - Dublin Jerome 2 (8 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 57 - 44 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Jerome |
Olentangy Liberty 5 (9 / 5) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (9 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Liberty | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Davidson |
Olentangy Orange 5 (12 / 2) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 61 - 18 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Orange | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Bradley |
Ottawa Hills 3 (11 / 5) - St. Francis DeSales 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 53 - 39 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Ottawa Hills | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
St. Francis DeSales |
Perry 5 - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 57 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Perry | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lakeside |
Perrysburg 3 (9 / 0) - Sylvania Northview 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 41 - 43 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Perrysburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Sylvania Northview |
Ready 4 (8 / 5) - Buckeye Valley 1 (0 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 50 - 30 O.o.F.: 2-4-5-1-3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Ready | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Buckeye Valley |
Reynoldsburg 4 (1 / 10) - Central Crossing 1 (0 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 57 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Reynoldsburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Central Crossing |
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Moeller 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Seven Hills | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Moeller |
Solon 5 (6 / 6) - Aurora 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 60 - 22 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Solon | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Aurora |
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 48 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Sycamore | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hamilton |
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Sidney 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Tippecanoe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Sidney |
Tippecanoe 5 (12 / 5) - Fairborn 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Tippecanoe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Fairborn |
Trotwood-Madison 3 - Northmont 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 57 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Trotwood-Madison | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northmont |
Troy 5 (10 / 2) - Fairborn 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Troy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Fairborn |
University School 5 (7 / 2) - Shaker Heights 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
University School | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Shaker Heights |
Valley View 4 - Eaton 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 55 - 24 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Eaton |
Valley View-B 5 - Northridge 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View-B | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Northridge |
Watkins Memorial 3 (15 / 0) - DeSales 2 (15 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 61 - 51 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Watkins Memorial | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
DeSales |
Wellington 5 (3 / 3) - Bloom-Carroll 0 (2 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Wellington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Bloom-Carroll |
Westerville Central 5 (9 / 5) - Westland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Westerville Central | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westland |
Westerville South 3 (4 / 9) - Franklin Heights 2 (10 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 54 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Westerville South | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Franklin Heights |
Wooster 3 (13 / 4) - Lake-Uniontown 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 68% # Games: 57 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Wooster | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Lake-Uniontown |
Worthington Kilbourne 3 (7 / 8) - Westerville North 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 57 - 59 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Worthington Kilbourne | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville North |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: