Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Friday, April 19 (click for: May 15 May 13 May 10 May 08 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Beachwood 3 (7 / 2) - Chagrin Falls 1 (0 / 4)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 20%
Score: 3-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 39 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beachwood
Results (Winning %)
Chagrin Falls   
Bexley 5 (14 / 8) - Orange 0 (6 / 4)
  • 60%
  • 62%
  • 62%
  • 58%
  • 60%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 60%
# Games: 68 - 45
O.o.F.: 5-4-1-2-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Orange   
Bexley 3 (14 / 8) - Massillon Jackson 2 (16 / 4)
  • 63%
  • 25%
  • 25%
  • 72%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 45 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Massillon Jackson   
Big Walnut 4 (12 / 5) - Westerville South 1 (4 / 9)
  • 60%
  • 33%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 54 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Centerville 5 (10 / 5) - Archbishop Alter 0 (4 / 8)
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
Chaminade-Julienne 3 (12 / 5) - Bellbrook 2 (4 / 6)
  • 8%
  • 57%
  • 47%
  • 92%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 45 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Bellbrook   
Copley 4 (6 / 7) - Tallmadge 1 (0 / 1)
  • 58%
  • 68%
  • 60%
  • 68%
  • 63%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 57 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Copley
Results (Winning %)
Tallmadge   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 3 (13 / 2) - Green 2 (1 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 46%
  • 25%
  • 56%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 55 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Green   
Dixie 4 - Valley View 1
  • 75%
  • 63%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 50%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 51 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dixie
Results (Winning %)
Valley View   
Dublin Coffman 5 (9 / 6) - Pickerington North 0 (5 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington North   
Dublin Jerome 4 (8 / 7) - Marysville 1 (9 / 4)
  • 0%
  • 68%
  • 86%
  • 65%
  • 43%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 55%
# Games: 47 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Marysville   
Franklin Heights 5 (10 / 7) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 7)
  • 86%
  • 68%
  • 71%
  • 60%
  • 60%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 68%
# Games: 61 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Franklin Heights
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Geneva 5 (3 / 1) - Lakeside 0 (3 / 13)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Geneva
Results (Winning %)
Lakeside   
Granville 5 (4 / 0) - Worthington Christian 0 (6 / 12)
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 48 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Granville
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Christian   
Hilliard Darby 5 (3 / 8) - Whetstone 0 (2 / 3)
  • 71%
  • 53%
  • 100%
  • 50%
  • 47%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 61%
# Games: 54 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Darby
Results (Winning %)
Whetstone   
Hudson 5 (8 / 2) - Stow-Munroe Falls 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hudson
Results (Winning %)
Stow-Munroe Falls   
Indian Hill 3 (12 / 3) - Mason 2 (8 / 6)
  • 29%
  • 56%
  • 37%
  • 63%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 50%
# Games: 51 - 51
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Indian Hill
Results (Winning %)
Mason   
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - London 2 (7 / 6)
  • 35%
  • 80%
  • 62%
  • 64%
  • 38%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 58 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
London   
Kettering Fairmont 3 (6 / 4) - Northmont 2
  • 8%
  • 14%
  • 80%
  • 68%
  • 57%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 49%
# Games: 45 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Lake-Uniontown 4 - Glenoak 1
  • 29%
  • 64%
  • 62%
  • 68%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 59 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lake-Uniontown
Results (Winning %)
Glenoak   
Lakota East 4 (10 / 4) - Elder 1
  • 50%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 62%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 58 - 23
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Elder   
Loveland 4 (9 / 9) - Little Miami 1 (0 / 2)
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 59%
  • 57%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 61 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Little Miami   
Massillon Jackson 4 (16 / 4) - Upper Arlington 1 (7 / 9)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 44%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 58 - 24
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-0-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Upper Arlington   
Milton-Union 5 - Bellefontaine 0 (12 / 5)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Milton-Union
Results (Winning %)
Bellefontaine   
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Gahanna 0 (13 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Gahanna   
Northwestern 3 (9 / 5) - Greenville 2
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 43%
  • 48%
  • 68%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 60 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Greenville   
Ottawa Hills 5 (11 / 5) - Vermilion 0
  • 52%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 60 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ottawa Hills
Results (Winning %)
Vermilion   
Pickerington Central 5 (6 / 4) - Newark 0 (8 / 3)
  • 59%
  • 92%
  • 63%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 61 - 19
O.o.F.: 5-4-3-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Newark   
Seven Hills 5 (14 / 2) - Badin 0 (2 / 2)
  • 60%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 57 - 16
O.o.F.: 2-5-4-3-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Badin   
Solon 5 (6 / 6) - Nordonia 0 (0 / 2)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 62%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 61 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Solon
Results (Winning %)
Nordonia   
Solon 4 (6 / 6) - Wadsworth 1 (0 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 50%
  • 43%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 66 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Solon
Results (Winning %)
Wadsworth   
St. Charles 3 (7 / 7) - Thomas Worthington 2 (2 / 17)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 67%
  • 29%
  • 38%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 49 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Charles
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Sycamore 4 (18 / 0) - Olentangy Orange 1 (12 / 2)
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 48%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 75%
# Games: 59 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Orange   
Sycamore-B 4 (1 / 1) - Centerville-B 1 (9 / 4)
  • 60%
  • 67%
  • 86%
  • 29%
  • 52%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 54 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore-B
Results (Winning %)
Centerville-B   
Troy 4 (10 / 2) - Butler 1
  • 86%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 81%
# Games: 48 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Butler   
Valley View-B 3 - Stivers 2
  • 0%
  • 8%
  • 86%
  • 63%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 37 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View-B
Results (Winning %)
Stivers   
Westerville Central 5 (9 / 5) - Mount Vernon 0 (0 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 61%
  • 67%
  • 86%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 62 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville Central
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   
Westerville North 4 (7 / 8) - Canal Winchester 1 (3 / 12)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 38%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 72%
# Games: 56 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville North
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - St. Edward 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 60 - 5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
St. Edward   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: