Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Tuesday, April 23 (click for: May 17 May 15 May 13 May 10 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Beavercreek 5 (10 / 3) - Miamisburg 0 (3 / 6)
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
Bellefontaine 4 (12 / 5) - Kenton Ridge 1 (0 / 8)
  • 50%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 61%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 76%
# Games: 57 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellefontaine
Results (Winning %)
Kenton Ridge   
Big Walnut 5 (12 / 5) - Canal Winchester 0 (3 / 12)
  • 100%
  • 63%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 58%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 59 - 22
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Centerville 5 (10 / 5) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (6 / 4)
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 60 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Kettering Fairmont   
Chaminade-Julienne 4 (12 / 5) - Archbishop Alter 1 (4 / 8)
  • 48%
  • 52%
  • 86%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 61%
# Games: 45 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
Chillicothe 3 (13 / 3) - Washington CH 2
  • 60%
  • 56%
  • 59%
  • 40%
  • 44%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 65 - 61
O.o.F.: 1-3-5-4-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Washington CH   
Columbus Academy 5 (15 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 6)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Delaware Hayes 5 (12 / 4) - Franklin Heights 0 (10 / 7)
  • 71%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 74%
# Games: 60 - 21
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Dublin Coffman 5 (9 / 6) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (4 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 79%
# Games: 60 - 16
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Bradley   
Dublin Jerome 5 (8 / 7) - Hilliard Darby 0 (3 / 8)
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 75%
  • 62%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 61 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Grove City 5 (5 / 7) - Westland 0
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - Northwestern 2 (9 / 5)
  • 0%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 20%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 39 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
Northwestern   
Jonathan Alder 3 (16 / 3) - London 2 (7 / 6)
  • 68%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 20%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 51 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
London   
Kettering Fairmont 5 (6 / 4) - Carroll 0 (0 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kettering Fairmont
Results (Winning %)
Carroll   
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Princeton   
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - Ashland 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
Ashland   
Loveland 4 (9 / 9) - Turpin 1 (0 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 58%
  • 29%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 56 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Turpin   
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Westerville Central 0 (9 / 5)
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Olentangy Berlin 5 (7 / 6) - Thomas Worthington 0 (2 / 17)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 60%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 77%
# Games: 60 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Pickerington Central 5 (6 / 4) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 10)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 88%
# Games: 60 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Reynoldsburg   
Pickerington North 3 (5 / 3) - Gahanna 2 (13 / 3)
  • 86%
  • 59%
  • 59%
  • 0%
  • 20%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 48%
# Games: 41 - 44
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington North
Results (Winning %)
Gahanna   
Springboro 5 (12 / 4) - Northmont 0
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 97%
# Games: 60 - 2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Sycamore 5 (18 / 0) - Fairfield 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Fairfield   
Upper Arlington 4 (7 / 9) - Hilliard Davidson 1 (9 / 7)
  • 57%
  • 8%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 53 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Davidson   
Valley View 5 - Northeastern 0 (0 / 1)
  • 64%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 89%
# Games: 62 - 8
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
Northeastern   
Waynesville 3 - Valley View-B 1
  • 57%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 40%
Score: 3-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 45 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Waynesville
Results (Winning %)
Valley View-B   
Westerville North 3 (7 / 8) - Dublin Scioto 1 (2 / 13)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 8%
Score: 3-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 37 - 15
O.o.F.: 4-3-1-2-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville North
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Whetstone 5 (2 / 3) - Beechcroft 0 (6 / 5)
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Whetstone
Results (Winning %)
Beechcroft   
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - New Philadelphia 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
New Philadelphia   
Worthington Kilbourne 4 (7 / 8) - Westerville South 1 (4 / 9)
  • 33%
  • 64%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 60 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Kilbourne
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: