Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Walnut 5 (7 / 5) - Marysville 0 (2 / 10) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 O.o.F.: 2-4-1-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Centerville 4 (12 / 1) - Seton 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 60 - 28 O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Seton | |||||
| Columbus Academy 4 (8 / 1) - Watterson 1 (10 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 56 - 37 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watterson | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (9 / 1) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whitehall | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 5 (8 / 7) - River Valley 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 61 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
River Valley | |||||
| DeSales 3 (3 / 4) - Lancaster 2 (4 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 45 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 5 (9 / 2) - Pickerington North 0 (4 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: # Games: 0 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Granville 3 (2 / 0) - Worthington Kilbourne 2 (7 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 46 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Granville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Hilliard Bradley 3 (3 / 3) - Hilliard Davidson 2 (2 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 45 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Mason 5 (13 / 0) - Springboro 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springboro | |||||
| New Albany 4 (10 / 4) - Gahanna 1 (10 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 64 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Oakwood 4 (5 / 0) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 55 - 21 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Oakwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy | |||||
| Seven Hills 3 (3 / 3) - Mount Notre Dame 2 (0 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 43 - 35 O.o.F.: 5-3-4-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mount Notre Dame | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (12 / 4) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hamilton | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (12 / 4) - Colerain 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Colerain | |||||
| Thomas Worthington 4 (5 / 5) - Westerville South 1 (1 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 78% # Games: 61 - 17 O.o.F.: 1-4-5-2-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Upper Arlington 3 (6 / 0) - Olentangy Berlin 0 (9 / 2) | Score: 3-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 36 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Walsh Jesuit 4 (1 / 2) - St. Joseph Academy 1 (8 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 53% # Games: 51 - 45 O.o.F.: 4-1-2-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Walsh Jesuit | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Western Reserve Academy 4 (11 / 0) - Hathaway Brown 1 (1 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 55 - 34 O.o.F.: 4-5-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hathaway Brown | |||||
| Western Reserve Academy-B 3 - North Canton Hoover 2 (13 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 47 - 51 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Western Reserve Academy-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Westerville Central 3 (11 / 0) - Watkins Memorial 2 (3 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 47 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (9 / 2) - Grandview 0 (5 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 O.o.F.: 2-4-1-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Grandview | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:



















































