Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Thursday, April 16 (click for: Apr 16 Apr 15 Apr 14 Apr 13 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Bellbrook 5 (8 / 2) - Miamisburg 0 (2 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
Bexley 5 (7 / 3) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Big Walnut 5 (8 / 0) - Worthington Kilbourne 0 (2 / 4)
  • 63%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 60 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Kilbourne   
Centerville-B 3 (4 / 2) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 2 (1 / 3)
  • 38%
  • 41%
  • 80%
  • 54%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 56 - 47
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy   
Chillicothe 5 (7 / 2) - Miami Trace 0
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 68%
  • 75%
  • 53%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 67 - 27
O.o.F.: 2-1-3-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Miami Trace   
Columbus Academy 5 (4 / 3) - Buckeye Valley 0 (1 / 5)
  • 71%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Dayton Christian 4 - Valley View 1
  • 20%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 60%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 57 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Valley View   
Delaware Hayes 5 (6 / 3) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 6)
  • 71%
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 82%
# Games: 60 - 13
O.o.F.: 4-5-3-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
DeSales 5 (4 / 3) - Hartley 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Hartley   
Grandview 5 (3 / 3) - Whitehall 0 (1 / 3)
  • 68%
  • 59%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 62 - 18
O.o.F.: 4-2-3-5-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grandview
Results (Winning %)
Whitehall   
Grove City 3 (3 / 3) - Gahanna 2 (8 / 2)
  • 71%
  • 65%
  • 62%
  • 14%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 52 - 47
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
Gahanna   
Hawken 3 (4 / 2) - Solon 2 (2 / 2)
  • 63%
  • 71%
  • 38%
  • 65%
  • 25%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 49 - 44
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hawken
Results (Winning %)
Solon   
Jonathan Alder 4 (5 / 5) - London 1 (3 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 38%
  • 52%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 59 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
London   
Lakota East 4 (7 / 2) - Lakota West 1 (1 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 59%
  • 25%
  • 53%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 62 - 49
O.o.F.: 4-1-2-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Lakota West   
Lancaster 5 (5 / 4) - Logan 0
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lancaster
Results (Winning %)
Logan   
Legacy Christian Academy 4 - Yellow Springs 1
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 67%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 50 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Legacy Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Yellow Springs   
Loveland 5 (8 / 0) - Lebanon 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Lebanon   
Mason 5 (8 / 1) - Fairfield 0 (0 / 2)
  • 60%
  • 71%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 77%
# Games: 60 - 18
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Fairfield   
Miami Valley School 5 (6 / 4) - Middletown Christian 0
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 90%
# Games: 60 - 7
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miami Valley School
Results (Winning %)
Middletown Christian   
Milton-Union 3 - Archbishop Alter 2 (2 / 4)
  • 8%
  • 20%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 52%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 49%
# Games: 41 - 43
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Milton-Union
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
New Albany 4 (8 / 0) - Pickerington North 0 (2 / 3)
  • 58%
  • 67%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 4-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 47 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Pickerington North   
Oakwood 5 (6 / 1) - Brookville 0
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Brookville   
Olentangy Berlin 5 (5 / 1) - Marysville 0 (1 / 5)
  • 63%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 67%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 60 - 19
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Marysville   
Olentangy Orange 5 (6 / 1) - Hilliard Bradley 0 (2 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Bradley   
Perrysburg 4 (4 / 0) - Whitmer 1
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 35%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 76%
# Games: 55 - 17
O.o.F.: 1-3-2-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Whitmer   
Sidney 5 - Piqua 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Piqua   
Thomas Worthington 4 (4 / 4) - Hilliard Darby 1 (0 / 5)
  • 14%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 65%
  • 50%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 60%
# Games: 55 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Thomas Worthington
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Troy 3 (5 / 1) - Stebbins 2
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 38%
  • 41%
  • 57%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 55 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Stebbins   
Upper Arlington 5 (9 / 1) - Dublin Coffman 0 (1 / 4)
  • 65%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 52%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 68%
# Games: 63 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Coffman   
Valley View-B 4 - Trotwood-Madison 1
  • 14%
  • 20%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 41 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View-B
Results (Winning %)
Trotwood-Madison   
Worthington Christian 5 (5 / 3) - Ready 0 (4 / 4)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Ready   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: