Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 5 (1 / 0) - Rocky River 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 64 - 24 O.o.F.: 2-1-5-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Rocky River | |||||
| Beavercreek-B 3 - Chaminade-Julienne 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 63% # Games: 47 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| DeSales 5 (1 / 0) - Thomas Worthington 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 61 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 3 (1 / 0) - Watkins Memorial 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 62% # Games: 52 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Jonathan Alder 5 (1 / 0) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Lakota East 5 (1 / 0) - Springboro-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 62 - 26 O.o.F.: 2-4-1-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springboro-B | |||||
| St. Marys Memorial 5 - Lehman Catholic 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 54 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Marys Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lehman Catholic | |||||
| Upper Arlington 3 (1 / 0) - Bexley 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 44 - 45 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bexley | |||||
| Wapakoneta 3 - Piqua 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 56 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wapakoneta | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Piqua | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:



















