Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Monday, April 13 (click for: Apr 16 Apr 15 Apr 14 Apr 13 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 5 (9 / 0) - Midview 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Midview   
Beavercreek-B 5 - Lehman Catholic 0 (1 / 3)
  • 68%
  • 71%
  • 63%
  • 86%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 61 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek-B
Results (Winning %)
Lehman Catholic   
Bellbrook 4 (8 / 2) - Archbishop Alter 1 (2 / 4)
  • 41%
  • 52%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 58 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
Big Walnut 5 (8 / 0) - Grove City 0 (3 / 3)
  • 67%
  • 52%
  • 55%
  • 63%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 61%
# Games: 59 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Grove City   
Canal Winchester 3 (4 / 5) - Westland 2
  • 25%
  • 92%
  • 63%
  • 60%
  • 20%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 43 - 40
O.o.F.: 2-5-1-3-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Canal Winchester
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Carlisle 4 - Monroe 1
  • 59%
  • 100%
  • 54%
  • 44%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 60 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carlisle
Results (Winning %)
Monroe   
Centerville 4 (8 / 2) - Walnut Hills 1 (1 / 3)
  • 67%
  • 68%
  • 45%
  • 80%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 63 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Walnut Hills   
Centerville-B 4 (4 / 2) - Springboro-B 1
  • 75%
  • 40%
  • 67%
  • 86%
  • 62%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 57 - 32
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville-B
Results (Winning %)
Springboro-B   
Chaminade-Julienne 5 (4 / 3) - Eaton 0
  • 62%
  • 63%
  • 92%
  • 67%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 72%
# Games: 61 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Eaton   
Columbus Academy 3 (4 / 3) - Dublin Coffman 2 (1 / 4)
  • 52%
  • 92%
  • 67%
  • 38%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 56 - 39
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Columbus Academy
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Coffman   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (5 / 0) - Padua 0
  • 86%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 48 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
Padua   
Dayton Christian 3 - Wyoming 2 (0 / 1)
  • 35%
  • 65%
  • 33%
  • 86%
  • 62%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 54 - 44
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Wyoming   
Gahanna 4 (8 / 2) - Bexley-B 1 (2 / 2)
  • 60%
  • 80%
  • 47%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 56 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Bexley-B   
Granville 5 (1 / 0) - Westerville South 0 (0 / 6)
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Granville
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Hawken 4 (4 / 2) - Chagrin Falls 1 (0 / 1)
  • 75%
  • 68%
  • 35%
  • 80%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 56 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hawken
Results (Winning %)
Chagrin Falls   
Hilliard Bradley 4 (2 / 3) - London 1 (3 / 3)
  • 68%
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 29%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 54 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Bradley
Results (Winning %)
London   
Kenton Ridge 3 (1 / 5) - Greenon 2
  • 33%
  • 29%
  • 68%
  • 59%
  • 100%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 54 - 45
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Kenton Ridge
Results (Winning %)
Greenon   
Lake-Uniontown 3 - North Canton Hoover 2 (6 / 3)
  • 60%
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 71%
  • 65%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 50%
# Games: 44 - 44
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lake-Uniontown
Results (Winning %)
North Canton Hoover   
Lakota East 5 (7 / 2) - Colerain 0 (1 / 2)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
O.o.F.: 3-4-1-5-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Colerain   
Lancaster 4 (5 / 4) - DeSales 1 (4 / 3)
  • 63%
  • 25%
  • 52%
  • 71%
  • 65%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 55%
# Games: 57 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lancaster
Results (Winning %)
DeSales   
Loveland 3 (8 / 0) - Moeller 2 (5 / 3)
  • 53%
  • 92%
  • 25%
  • 71%
  • 20%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 39 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Moeller   
Mason 4 (8 / 1) - Sycamore 1 (3 / 4)
  • 63%
  • 75%
  • 44%
  • 59%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 55%
# Games: 61 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Sycamore   
Mason-B 3 (2 / 0) - Beavercreek 2 (8 / 3)
  • 14%
  • 67%
  • 37%
  • 52%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 49%
# Games: 45 - 47
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason-B
Results (Winning %)
Beavercreek   
Massillon Jackson 4 (8 / 2) - Glenoak 1
  • 92%
  • 37%
  • 56%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 53 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Glenoak   
Miami Valley School 3 (6 / 4) - Milton-Union 2
  • 38%
  • 52%
  • 71%
  • 80%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 59 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miami Valley School
Results (Winning %)
Milton-Union   
New Albany 4 (8 / 0) - Bexley 1 (7 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 86%
  • 46%
  • 52%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 59 - 29
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
Northwestern 3 (5 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 2 (5 / 5)
  • 92%
  • 29%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 44%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 52 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Oakwood 4 (6 / 1) - Kettering Fairmont 1 (5 / 5)
  • 75%
  • 48%
  • 75%
  • 67%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 61 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Kettering Fairmont   
Perrysburg 4 (4 / 0) - Fremont Ross 1
  • 63%
  • 67%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 43%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 58 - 34
O.o.F.: 3-4-2-1-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Fremont Ross   
Pickerington Central 5 (7 / 1) - Westerville North 0 (1 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Westerville North   
Pickerington North 4 (2 / 3) - Dublin Scioto 1 (4 / 3)
  • 65%
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 56%
  • 25%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 55 - 34
O.o.F.: 2-3-5-1-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington North
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Piqua 4 - Tecumseh 1 (0 / 3)
  • 71%
  • 80%
  • 75%
  • 59%
  • 35%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 56 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Piqua
Results (Winning %)
Tecumseh   
Reynoldsburg 4 (3 / 4) - Thomas Worthington 1 (4 / 4)
  • 80%
  • 80%
  • 29%
  • 75%
  • 54%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 62%
# Games: 54 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Reynoldsburg
Results (Winning %)
Thomas Worthington   
Seven Hills 3 (4 / 1) - Turpin 2 (0 / 1)
  • 33%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 64%
  • 48%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 55 - 39
O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Seven Hills
Results (Winning %)
Turpin   
Sidney 3 - Northmont 2
  • 52%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 63%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 50 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Northmont   
Tippecanoe-B 5 - Wayne 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Tippecanoe-B
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
Trotwood-Madison 3 - Stebbins 2
  • 75%
  • 63%
  • 50%
  • 25%
  • 14%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 47%
# Games: 46 - 51
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Trotwood-Madison
Results (Winning %)
Stebbins   
University School 3 (3 / 0) - Mentor 2 (0 / 1)
  • 33%
  • 71%
  • 43%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 51 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
University School
Results (Winning %)
Mentor   
Upper Arlington 4 (9 / 1) - Watkins Memorial 1 (6 / 3)
  • 50%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 74%
# Games: 57 - 20
O.o.F.: 5-3-4-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Watkins Memorial   
Valley View 5 - Carroll 0 (1 / 3)
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 60 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
Carroll   
Valley View-B 3 - Northeastern 2 (0 / 1)
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 54%
  • 64%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 49%
# Games: 52 - 55
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View-B
Results (Winning %)
Northeastern   
Watterson 4 (3 / 2) - Chillicothe 1 (7 / 2)
  • 8%
  • 67%
  • 63%
  • 60%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 49 - 34
O.o.F.: 1-5-2-4-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watterson
Results (Winning %)
Chillicothe   
Westerville Central 4 (2 / 4) - Delaware Hayes 1 (6 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 65%
  • 75%
  • 50%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 60 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville Central
Results (Winning %)
Delaware Hayes   
Whetstone 5 (5 / 0) - Columbus North International 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 32 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Whetstone
Results (Winning %)
Columbus North International   
Whetstone 5 (5 / 0) - Beechcroft 0 (0 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 71%
  • 58%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 76%
# Games: 62 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Whetstone
Results (Winning %)
Beechcroft   
Worthington Christian 5 (5 / 3) - Franklin Heights 0 (0 / 7)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: