Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beavercreek 5 (8 / 3) - Wayne 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Wayne | |||||
| Bellbrook 5 (8 / 2) - Monroe 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 60 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bellbrook | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Monroe | |||||
| Bellefontaine 3 (1 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 2 (5 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 58 - 48 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bellefontaine | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Jonathan Alder | |||||
| Bexley 4 (7 / 3) - Columbus Academy 1 (4 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 64 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bexley | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Butler 4 - Piqua 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 66 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Butler | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Piqua | |||||
| Centerville 5 (8 / 2) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (5 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 60 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
| Chaminade-Julienne 3 (4 / 3) - Badin 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 24 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Badin | |||||
| Chillicothe 3 (7 / 2) - Jackson 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 49 - 39 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chillicothe | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Jackson | |||||
| Dayton Christian 5 - Brookville 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 61 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dayton Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Brookville | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 5 (6 / 3) - Worthington Kilbourne 0 (2 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 63% # Games: 59 - 34 O.o.F.: 4-5-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| DeSales 4 (4 / 3) - Mount Vernon 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 54 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mount Vernon | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 5 (1 / 4) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (3 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 83% # Games: 60 - 12 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 4 (5 / 1) - Olentangy Berlin 1 (5 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 75% # Games: 60 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 5 (4 / 3) - Westland 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 O.o.F.: 5-2-4-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Fairborn 3 - Sidney 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 54 - 57 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Fairborn | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sidney | |||||
| Fenwick 4 (1 / 1) - Carroll 1 (1 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 53 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Fenwick | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Carroll | |||||
| Gahanna 4 (8 / 2) - Westerville Central 1 (2 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 55 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Indian Hill 5 (5 / 1) - Mariemont 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 O.o.F.: 5-4-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mariemont | |||||
| Lakota East 5 (7 / 2) - Oak Hills 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 60 - 21 O.o.F.: 3-5-2-1-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Oak Hills | |||||
| Loveland 3 (8 / 0) - Walnut Hills 2 (1 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 47 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Walnut Hills | |||||
| Mason 5 (8 / 1) - Middletown 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Middletown | |||||
| McNicholas 4 (1 / 1) - Archbishop Alter 1 (2 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 58% # Games: 70 - 50 O.o.F.: 3-2-5-1-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
McNicholas | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Archbishop Alter | |||||
| MIami Valley School 4 (6 / 4) - Legacy Christian Academy 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 47 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
MIami Valley School | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Legacy Christian Academy | |||||
| Moeller 5 (5 / 3) - La Salle 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 61 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Moeller | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
La Salle | |||||
| New Albany 5 (8 / 0) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 48 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Crossing | |||||
| Newark 4 (5 / 2) - Canal Winchester 1 (4 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 52 - 24 O.o.F.: 3-5-2-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Northwestern 5 (5 / 1) - Shawnee 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Northwestern | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Shawnee | |||||
| Orange 3 (2 / 1) - Massillon Jackson 2 (8 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 57 - 48 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Perrysburg 4 (4 / 0) - Springfield Holland 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 53 - 22 O.o.F.: 3-4-5-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Perrysburg | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springfield Holland | |||||
| Pickerington Central 5 (7 / 1) - Lancaster 0 (5 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 66% # Games: 70 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Ready 4 (4 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 1 (1 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 57% # Games: 60 - 46 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ready | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Reynoldsburg 3 (3 / 4) - Logan 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 51 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Logan | |||||
| Springboro 5 (4 / 1) - Miamisburg 0 (2 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Springboro | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miamisburg | |||||
| St. Johns Jesuit 3 (4 / 0) - Ottawa Hills 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 52 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Johns Jesuit | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ottawa Hills | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (3 / 4) - Lakota West 0 (1 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 62 - 16 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lakota West | |||||
| Thomas Worthington 3 (4 / 4) - Marysville 2 (1 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 50 - 49 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Upper Arlington 3 (9 / 1) - Olentangy Orange 2 (6 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 65 - 53 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Orange | |||||
| Valley View 4 - Eaton 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 67 - 37 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Valley View | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Eaton | |||||
| Watkins Memorial 5 (6 / 3) - Zanesville 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 O.o.F.: 4-3-5-1-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Zanesville | |||||
| Westerville North 4 (1 / 3) - Westerville South 1 (0 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 69 - 47 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Whitehall 3 (1 / 3) - Franklin Heights 2 (0 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 54 - 43 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Whitehall | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Wooster 5 (7 / 1) - Madison Comprehensive 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Madison Comprehensive | |||||
| Worthington Christian 5 (5 / 3) - Grandview 0 (3 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 59 - 25 O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Grandview | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:




































































