Boys Daily Tennis Results

 

Team Results for Tuesday, April 14 (click for: Apr 16 Apr 15 Apr 14 Apr 13 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Beavercreek 5 (8 / 3) - Wayne 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Wayne   
Bellbrook 5 (8 / 2) - Monroe 0
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 85%
# Games: 60 - 11
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Monroe   
Bellefontaine 3 (1 / 1) - Jonathan Alder 2 (5 / 5)
  • 61%
  • 37%
  • 71%
  • 65%
  • 41%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 58 - 48
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellefontaine
Results (Winning %)
Jonathan Alder   
Bexley 4 (7 / 3) - Columbus Academy 1 (4 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 68%
  • 52%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 64 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bexley
Results (Winning %)
Columbus Academy   
Butler 4 - Piqua 1
  • 80%
  • 45%
  • 100%
  • 64%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 69%
# Games: 66 - 30
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Butler
Results (Winning %)
Piqua   
Centerville 5 (8 / 2) - Kettering Fairmont 0 (5 / 5)
  • 71%
  • 75%
  • 63%
  • 100%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 73%
# Games: 60 - 22
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Kettering Fairmont   
Chaminade-Julienne 3 (4 / 3) - Badin 2 (0 / 2)
  • 47%
  • 20%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 48%
# Games: 24 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Badin   
Chillicothe 3 (7 / 2) - Jackson 2
  • 80%
  • 71%
  • 68%
  • 29%
  • 35%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 49 - 39
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chillicothe
Results (Winning %)
Jackson   
Dayton Christian 5 - Brookville 0
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 62%
  • 92%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 78%
# Games: 61 - 17
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Brookville   
Delaware Hayes 5 (6 / 3) - Worthington Kilbourne 0 (2 / 4)
  • 62%
  • 53%
  • 63%
  • 80%
  • 62%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 63%
# Games: 59 - 34
O.o.F.: 4-5-3-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Delaware Hayes
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Kilbourne   
DeSales 4 (4 / 3) - Mount Vernon 1 (0 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 39%
  • 100%
  • 65%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 73%
# Games: 54 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
DeSales
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   
Dublin Coffman 5 (1 / 4) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (3 / 2)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 83%
# Games: 60 - 12
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Coffman
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Davidson   
Dublin Jerome 4 (5 / 1) - Olentangy Berlin 1 (5 / 1)
  • 80%
  • 55%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 75%
# Games: 60 - 20
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Berlin   
Dublin Scioto 5 (4 / 3) - Westland 0
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 94%
# Games: 60 - 4
O.o.F.: 5-2-4-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Scioto
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Fairborn 3 - Sidney 2
  • 71%
  • 39%
  • 0%
  • 53%
  • 67%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 49%
# Games: 54 - 57
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Fairborn
Results (Winning %)
Sidney   
Fenwick 4 (1 / 1) - Carroll 1 (1 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 65%
  • 57%
  • 75%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 53 - 26
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Fenwick
Results (Winning %)
Carroll   
Gahanna 4 (8 / 2) - Westerville Central 1 (2 / 4)
  • 25%
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 68%
  • 54%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 55 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Gahanna
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Indian Hill 5 (5 / 1) - Mariemont 0 (1 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 87%
# Games: 60 - 9
O.o.F.: 5-4-3-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Indian Hill
Results (Winning %)
Mariemont   
Lakota East 5 (7 / 2) - Oak Hills 0 (0 / 3)
  • 67%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 75%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 74%
# Games: 60 - 21
O.o.F.: 3-5-2-1-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Oak Hills   
Loveland 3 (8 / 0) - Walnut Hills 2 (1 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 48%
  • 8%
  • 80%
  • 75%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 59%
# Games: 47 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Walnut Hills   
Mason 5 (8 / 1) - Middletown 0 (0 / 1)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Mason
Results (Winning %)
Middletown   
McNicholas 4 (1 / 1) - Archbishop Alter 1 (2 / 4)
  • 56%
  • 37%
  • 100%
  • 57%
  • 59%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 58%
# Games: 70 - 50
O.o.F.: 3-2-5-1-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
McNicholas
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
MIami Valley School 4 (6 / 4) - Legacy Christian Academy 1
  • 86%
  • 52%
  • 100%
  • 0%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 47 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
MIami Valley School
Results (Winning %)
Legacy Christian Academy   
Moeller 5 (5 / 3) - La Salle 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 72%
  • 71%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 61 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Moeller
Results (Winning %)
La Salle   
New Albany 5 (8 / 0) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 48 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Newark 4 (5 / 2) - Canal Winchester 1 (4 / 5)
  • 53%
  • 80%
  • 100%
  • 33%
  • 100%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 52 - 24
O.o.F.: 3-5-2-4-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Newark
Results (Winning %)
Canal Winchester   
Northwestern 5 (5 / 1) - Shawnee 0
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 60 - 10
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northwestern
Results (Winning %)
Shawnee   
Orange 3 (2 / 1) - Massillon Jackson 2 (8 / 2)
  • 65%
  • 60%
  • 46%
  • 71%
  • 29%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 54%
# Games: 57 - 48
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Orange
Results (Winning %)
Massillon Jackson   
Perrysburg 4 (4 / 0) - Springfield Holland 1
  • 29%
  • 71%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 71%
# Games: 53 - 22
O.o.F.: 3-4-5-2-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Perrysburg
Results (Winning %)
Springfield Holland   
Pickerington Central 5 (7 / 1) - Lancaster 0 (5 / 4)
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 59%
  • 52%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 66%
# Games: 70 - 36
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Lancaster   
Ready 4 (4 / 4) - Buckeye Valley 1 (1 / 5)
  • 68%
  • 53%
  • 67%
  • 68%
  • 14%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 60 - 46
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ready
Results (Winning %)
Buckeye Valley   
Reynoldsburg 3 (3 / 4) - Logan 2
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 75%
  • 29%
  • 43%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 60%
# Games: 51 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Reynoldsburg
Results (Winning %)
Logan   
Springboro 5 (4 / 1) - Miamisburg 0 (2 / 6)
  • 67%
  • 100%
  • 67%
  • 92%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 60 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Springboro
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
St. Johns Jesuit 3 (4 / 0) - Ottawa Hills 2 (0 / 1)
  • 40%
  • 32%
  • 100%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 61%
# Games: 52 - 33
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Johns Jesuit
Results (Winning %)
Ottawa Hills   
Sycamore 5 (3 / 4) - Lakota West 0 (1 / 4)
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 65%
  • 72%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 79%
# Games: 62 - 16
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sycamore
Results (Winning %)
Lakota West   
Thomas Worthington 3 (4 / 4) - Marysville 2 (1 / 5)
  • 56%
  • 58%
  • 80%
  • 35%
  • 20%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 50 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Thomas Worthington
Results (Winning %)
Marysville   
Upper Arlington 3 (9 / 1) - Olentangy Orange 2 (6 / 1)
  • 42%
  • 40%
  • 72%
  • 60%
  • 62%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 65 - 53
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Upper Arlington
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Orange   
Valley View 4 - Eaton 1
  • 80%
  • 51%
  • 100%
  • 48%
  • 80%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 67 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Valley View
Results (Winning %)
Eaton   
Watkins Memorial 5 (6 / 3) - Zanesville 0
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 98%
# Games: 60 - 1
O.o.F.: 4-3-5-1-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Zanesville   
Westerville North 4 (1 / 3) - Westerville South 1 (0 / 6)
  • 61%
  • 33%
  • 64%
  • 75%
  • 62%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 59%
# Games: 69 - 47
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Westerville North
Results (Winning %)
Westerville South   
Whitehall 3 (1 / 3) - Franklin Heights 2 (0 / 7)
  • 65%
  • 67%
  • 67%
  • 33%
  • 48%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 54 - 43
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Whitehall
Results (Winning %)
Franklin Heights   
Wooster 5 (7 / 1) - Madison Comprehensive 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 60 - 0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Wooster
Results (Winning %)
Madison Comprehensive   
Worthington Christian 5 (5 / 3) - Grandview 0 (3 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 63%
  • 62%
  • 50%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 70%
# Games: 59 - 25
O.o.F.: 2-1-4-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Grandview   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: