Boys Daily Tennis Results

View Mode
Line-up View

 

Team Results for Wednesday, April 15 (click for: Apr 16 Apr 15 Apr 14 Apr 13 )
Match Results (with W/L records if available)
% Games Won By Court
Results
Avon 5 (9 / 0) - Amherst Steele 0 (0 / 1)
  • 62%
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 61 - 15
O.o.F.: 4-2-5-3-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Avon
Results (Winning %)
Amherst Steele   
Beavercreek 5 (8 / 3) - Northwestern 0 (5 / 1)
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 86%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 80%
# Games: 60 - 15
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Beavercreek
Results (Winning %)
Northwestern   
Bellbrook 4 (8 / 2) - Kettering Fairmont 1 (5 / 5)
  • 86%
  • 38%
  • 92%
  • 86%
  • 59%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 57 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Bellbrook
Results (Winning %)
Kettering Fairmont   
Big Walnut 3 (8 / 0) - Upper Arlington-B 2 (0 / 1)
  • 86%
  • 60%
  • 40%
  • 45%
  • 55%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 70 - 58
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Big Walnut
Results (Winning %)
Upper Arlington-B   
Canal Winchester 3 (4 / 5) - Zanesville 2
  • 8%
  • 65%
  • 67%
  • 71%
  • 28%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 47 - 45
O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Canal Winchester
Results (Winning %)
Zanesville   
Carlisle 5 - Greeneview 0
  • 75%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 92%
# Games: 48 - 4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Carlisle
Results (Winning %)
Greeneview   
Centerville 4 (8 / 2) - Tippecanoe 1 (1 / 4)
  • 29%
  • 53%
  • 64%
  • 67%
  • 67%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 62 - 48
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Centerville
Results (Winning %)
Tippecanoe   
Chaminade-Julienne 4 (4 / 3) - Kenton Ridge 1 (1 / 5)
  • 75%
  • 75%
  • 53%
  • 75%
  • 55%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 65%
# Games: 58 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Chaminade-Julienne
Results (Winning %)
Kenton Ridge   
Copley 3 (2 / 0) - Barberton 2
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 80%
  • 42%
  • 37%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 63%
# Games: 51 - 30
O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Copley
Results (Winning %)
Barberton   
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (5 / 0) - St. Vincent-St. Mary 0 (0 / 1)
  • 92%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy
Results (Winning %)
St. Vincent-St. Mary   
Dayton Christian 5 - Dixie 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 80%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 95%
# Games: 60 - 3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dayton Christian
Results (Winning %)
Dixie   
Dublin Jerome 4 (5 / 1) - Bexley 1 (7 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 58%
  • 62%
  • 14%
  • 63%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 57%
# Games: 53 - 40
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Dublin Jerome
Results (Winning %)
Bexley   
Grove City 3 (3 / 3) - DeSales 2 (4 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 37%
  • 40%
  • 92%
  • 59%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 58%
# Games: 52 - 37
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Grove City
Results (Winning %)
DeSales   
Hamilton Township 4 (1 / 0) - Westland 1
  • 92%
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 80%
  • 43%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 73%
# Games: 58 - 22
O.o.F.: 3-1-2-4-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hamilton Township
Results (Winning %)
Westland   
Hilliard Davidson 3 (3 / 2) - Hilliard Darby 2 (0 / 5)
  • 33%
  • 100%
  • 43%
  • 75%
  • 86%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 61%
# Games: 55 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Hilliard Davidson
Results (Winning %)
Hilliard Darby   
Indian Hill 3 (5 / 1) - St. Xavier 2 (1 / 1)
  • 38%
  • 29%
  • 54%
  • 71%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 51%
# Games: 53 - 50
O.o.F.: 5-2-4-1-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Indian Hill
Results (Winning %)
St. Xavier   
Jonathan Alder 3 (5 / 5) - Grandview 2 (3 / 3)
  • 86%
  • 80%
  • 46%
  • 47%
  • 33%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 53%
# Games: 62 - 54
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Jonathan Alder
Results (Winning %)
Grandview   
Lakota East 5 (7 / 2) - Badin 0 (0 / 2)
  • 80%
  • 56%
  • 80%
  • 0%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 71%
# Games: 34 - 14
O.o.F.: 3-1-2-0-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lakota East
Results (Winning %)
Badin   
Lexington 5 (5 / 3) - West Holmes 0
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 100%
# Games: 48 - 0
O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-0
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Lexington
Results (Winning %)
West Holmes   
London 4 (3 / 3) - Kenton Ridge 1 (1 / 5)
  • 68%
  • 86%
  • 14%
  • 92%
  • 69%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 57 - 29
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
London
Results (Winning %)
Kenton Ridge   
Loveland 4 (8 / 0) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 1 (1 / 3)
  • 92%
  • 71%
  • 29%
  • 60%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 63%
# Games: 53 - 31
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Loveland
Results (Winning %)
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy   
Massillon Jackson 3 (8 / 2) - Wooster 2 (7 / 1)
  • 60%
  • 28%
  • 25%
  • 86%
  • 60%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 51 - 47
O.o.F.: 4-5-2-3-1
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Massillon Jackson
Results (Winning %)
Wooster   
Miami Valley School 3 (6 / 4) - Archbishop Alter 2 (2 / 4)
  • 20%
  • 29%
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 71%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 56%
# Games: 44 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Miami Valley School
Results (Winning %)
Archbishop Alter   
Moeller 4 (5 / 3) - Seven Hills 1 (4 / 1)
  • 86%
  • 63%
  • 14%
  • 86%
  • 71%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 64%
# Games: 50 - 28
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Moeller
Results (Winning %)
Seven Hills   
New Albany 4 (8 / 0) - Olentangy Liberty 1 (1 / 3)
  • 35%
  • 59%
  • 53%
  • 71%
  • 61%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 56%
# Games: 62 - 49
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
New Albany
Results (Winning %)
Olentangy Liberty   
North Canton Hoover 4 (6 / 3) - Glenoak 1
  • 86%
  • 92%
  • 44%
  • 75%
  • 62%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 56 - 24
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
North Canton Hoover
Results (Winning %)
Glenoak   
Northmont 3 - Lehman Catholic 2 (1 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 86%
  • 8%
  • 71%
  • 25%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 55%
# Games: 41 - 34
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Northmont
Results (Winning %)
Lehman Catholic   
Oakwood 4 (6 / 1) - Miamisburg 1 (2 / 6)
  • 71%
  • 71%
  • 45%
  • 80%
  • 86%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 68%
# Games: 58 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Oakwood
Results (Winning %)
Miamisburg   
Olentangy Berlin 3 (5 / 1) - Lancaster 2 (5 / 4)
  • 32%
  • 64%
  • 63%
  • 55%
  • 46%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 52%
# Games: 63 - 58
O.o.F.: 1-3-5-4-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Berlin
Results (Winning %)
Lancaster   
Olentangy Orange 5 (6 / 1) - Westerville Central 0 (2 / 4)
  • 75%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Olentangy Orange
Results (Winning %)
Westerville Central   
Pickerington Central 4 (7 / 1) - Dublin Scioto 1 (4 / 3)
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 86%
  • 71%
  • 38%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 67%
# Games: 56 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington Central
Results (Winning %)
Dublin Scioto   
Pickerington North 4 (2 / 3) - Delaware Hayes 1 (6 / 3)
  • 80%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 41%
  • 62%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 70%
# Games: 58 - 25
O.o.F.: 3-1-2-5-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Pickerington North
Results (Winning %)
Delaware Hayes   
Ready 5 (4 / 4) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 3)
  • 65%
  • 100%
  • 67%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 66%
# Games: 48 - 25
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Ready
Results (Winning %)
Central Crossing   
Sidney 3 - Elida 2
  • 62%
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 43%
  • 38%
Score: 3-2
% Games: 60%
# Games: 57 - 38
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Sidney
Results (Winning %)
Elida   
St. Charles 5 (2 / 1) - Hartley 0 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 58%
  • 100%
  • 92%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 86%
# Games: 59 - 10
O.o.F.: 4-2-1-5-3
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Charles
Results (Winning %)
Hartley   
St. Xavier-B 4 - Centerville-B 1 (4 / 2)
  • 65%
  • 57%
  • 67%
  • 55%
  • 32%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 55%
# Games: 64 - 52
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
St. Xavier-B
Results (Winning %)
Centerville-B   
Thomas Worthington 5 (4 / 4) - Mount Vernon 0 (0 / 3)
  • 60%
  • 61%
  • 67%
  • 55%
  • 68%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 61%
# Games: 78 - 49
O.o.F.: 5-3-2-1-4
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Thomas Worthington
Results (Winning %)
Mount Vernon   
Troy 4 (5 / 1) - Tecumseh 1 (0 / 3)
  • 100%
  • 75%
  • 86%
  • 20%
  • 59%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 66%
# Games: 52 - 27
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Troy
Results (Winning %)
Tecumseh   
Watkins Memorial 5 (6 / 3) - Newark 0 (5 / 2)
  • 100%
  • 92%
  • 100%
  • 100%
  • 71%
Score: 5-0
% Games: 91%
# Games: 60 - 6
O.o.F.: 1-4-2-3-5
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Watkins Memorial
Results (Winning %)
Newark   
Whetstone 4 (5 / 0) - Northland 1 (0 / 1)
  • 20%
  • 57%
  • 48%
  • 92%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 53%
# Games: 39 - 35
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Whetstone
Results (Winning %)
Northland   
Worthington Christian 4 (5 / 3) - Worthington Kilbourne 1 (2 / 4)
  • 80%
  • 55%
  • 50%
  • 80%
  • 47%
Score: 4-1
% Games: 58%
# Games: 69 - 50
O.o.F.: 4-1-5-3-2
Team Line-ups
Sngl 1
Sngl 2
Sngl 3
Doub 1
Doub 2
Worthington Christian
Results (Winning %)
Worthington Kilbourne   

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.

Member is logged in as: - Access level is: