Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellbrook 5 (15 / 2) - Talawanda 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 61 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Bellbrook | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Talawanda | |||||
| Big Walnut 5 (12 / 3) - Thomas Worthington 0 (6 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 60 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Carlisle 3 - Valley View 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 46 - 51 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Carlisle | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Valley View | |||||
| Centerville 5 (14 / 2) - Beavercreek 0 (11 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 71% # Games: 61 - 25 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beavercreek | |||||
| Centerville-B 5 (8 / 3) - Tippecanoe-B 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 76% # Games: 60 - 19 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville-B | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Tippecanoe-B | |||||
| Chaminade-Julienne 3 (5 / 8) - Lehman Catholic 2 (2 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 58 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lehman Catholic | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 5 (9 / 2) - Columbus Academy 0 (7 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 72% # Games: 61 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Dublin Scioto 4 (7 / 6) - Hilliard Davidson 1 (5 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 55 - 30 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Eaton 4 - Brookville 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 58% # Games: 44 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Eaton | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Brookville | |||||
| Grandview 3 (7 / 4) - Hilliard Bradley 2 (3 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 43 - 38 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Grove City 4 (7 / 3) - Hilliard Darby 1 (1 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 74% # Games: 64 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grove City | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Indian Hill 4 (12 / 2) - Mason-B 1 (4 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 57% # Games: 51 - 38 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mason-B | |||||
| Kettering Fairmont 5 (12 / 6) - Springfield 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 63 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Kettering Fairmont | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springfield | |||||
| Lakota East 5 (13 / 5) - Princeton 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 60 - 16 O.o.F.: 5-3-2-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Princeton | |||||
| Lancaster 3 (10 / 4) - Watkins Memorial 2 (10 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 45% # Games: 50 - 62 O.o.F.: 4-2-3-1-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Watkins Memorial | |||||
| Loveland 3 (14 / 2) - Milford 2 (0 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 69% # Games: 52 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Loveland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Milford | |||||
| Marysville 5 (4 / 8) - Centennial 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 59 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Marysville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Centennial | |||||
| Miami Valley School 3 (11 / 4) - Archbishop Alter 2 (5 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 44 - 36 O.o.F.: 3-4-1-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Miami Valley School | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Archbishop Alter | |||||
| New Albany 3 (11 / 2) - Olentangy 2 (7 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 57 - 44 O.o.F.: 2-5-3-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Newark 5 (8 / 5) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 47 - 7 O.o.F.: 5-4-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Crossing | |||||
| Oakwood 3 (10 / 4) - Waynesville 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 56 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Oakwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Waynesville | |||||
| Pickerington Central 3 (15 / 2) - Gahanna 2 (12 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 48 - 37 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Gahanna | |||||
| Reynoldsburg 3 (7 / 6) - Whetstone 2 (6 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 50 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whetstone | |||||
| Seven Hills 5 (10 / 2) - Cincinnati Country Day 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 60 - 15 O.o.F.: 5-4-3-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cincinnati Country Day | |||||
| Sidney 3 - Beavercreek-B 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 50 - 48 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sidney | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beavercreek-B | |||||
| St. Charles 3 (3 / 5) - DeSales 2 (6 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 54 - 48 O.o.F.: 1-5-3-4-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Charles | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
DeSales | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (11 / 6) - Fairfield 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 61 - 11 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Fairfield | |||||
| Sylvania Northview 3 (1 / 1) - Perrysburg 2 (10 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 50% # Games: 56 - 57 O.o.F.: 3-2-1-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sylvania Northview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Perrysburg | |||||
| Tippecanoe 4 (6 / 5) - Milton-Union 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 54 - 20 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Tippecanoe | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Milton-Union | |||||
| Troy 3 (10 / 3) - Miamisburg 2 (6 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 46% # Games: 43 - 51 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Troy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miamisburg | |||||
| Westerville Central 4 (4 / 8) - Westerville North 1 (2 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 76% # Games: 53 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Westland 5 - Groveport 0 (0 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 79% # Games: 61 - 16 O.o.F.: 2-1-5-3-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westland | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Groveport | |||||
| Wooster 5 (13 / 2) - New Philadelphia 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Wooster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
New Philadelphia | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:

























































