Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archbishop Alter 3 (6 / 11) - Elder 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 71% # Games: 55 - 23 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Archbishop Alter | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Elder | |||||
| Chaminade-Julienne 4 (6 / 10) - Carroll 1 (3 / 9) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 78% # Games: 57 - 16 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Chaminade-Julienne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Carroll | |||||
| Columbus Academy 3 (10 / 9) - Worthington Christian 0 (12 / 6) | Score: 3-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 36 - 6 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| DeSales 4 (7 / 7) - Delaware Hayes 1 (11 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 48 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Lakota East 3 (14 / 5) - Loveland 2 (15 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 43 - 48 O.o.F.: 3-2-1-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lakota East | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Loveland | |||||
| Mason 3 (17 / 2) - Indian Hill 2 (13 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 51 - 53 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Newark 5 (11 / 5) - Mount Vernon 0 (0 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 70 - 32 O.o.F.: 5-4-2-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mount Vernon | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (12 / 3) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (5 / 9) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 61 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Olentangy Orange 4 (16 / 2) - Olentangy 1 (8 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 67 - 46 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Seven Hills 3 (11 / 3) - Anderson 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 61 - 46 O.o.F.: 2-3-1-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Anderson | |||||
| Sycamore 5 (12 / 6) - Walnut Hills 0 (1 / 5) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Walnut Hills | |||||
| Tippecanoe 4 (7 / 5) - Moeller 1 (13 / 7) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 49 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Tippecanoe | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Moeller | |||||
| Westerville North 3 (3 / 9) - Worthington Kilbourne 2 (6 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 45 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:
































