Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 5 (6 / 2) - Glenoak 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 O.o.F.: 2-5-3-1-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Glenoak | |||||
| Centerville 5 (7 / 0) - Northmont 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Northmont | |||||
| Cincinnati Country Day 3 (1 / 0) - Seven Hills 2 (1 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 50 - 49 O.o.F.: 3-2-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cincinnati Country Day | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Columbus Academy 3 (2 / 0) - Dublin Coffman 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 48 - 42 O.o.F.: 5-1-2-3-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (4 / 0) - Ready 0 (3 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Ready | |||||
| DeSales 3 (1 / 1) - Marysville 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 51 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
DeSales | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Franklin Heights 5 (1 / 2) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 56 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whitehall | |||||
| Grandview 3 (2 / 0) - Canal Winchester 2 (3 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 45 - 37 O.o.F.: 4-2-3-1-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Grove City 4 (1 / 1) - Westerville South 1 (0 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 57 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grove City | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville South | |||||
| Lancaster 4 (1 / 0) - Huron 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 68% # Games: 52 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Huron | |||||
| London 4 (1 / 0) - Tecumseh 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 53 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
London | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Tecumseh | |||||
| New Albany 4 (3 / 2) - Olentangy Liberty 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 73% # Games: 58 - 22 O.o.F.: 2-1-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Liberty | |||||
| Newark 5 (3 / 0) - Hartley 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 69% # Games: 59 - 26 O.o.F.: 4-3-5-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hartley | |||||
| North Canton Hoover 4 (5 / 2) - Lexington 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 54 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lexington | |||||
| Notre Dame Academy 4 (2 / 2) - St. Joseph Academy 1 (3 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 60 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (2 / 1) - Buckeye Valley 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Buckeye Valley | |||||
| Orange 5 (3 / 1) - Indian Hill 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 80% # Games: 59 - 15 O.o.F.: 3-4-5-2-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Indian Hill | |||||
| Pickerington North 4 (1 / 2) - Reynoldsburg 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 65% # Games: 63 - 34 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Solon 3 (4 / 0) - Gilmour Academy 2 (1 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 37 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Solon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Gilmour Academy | |||||
| St. Ursula Academy 5 (4 / 2) - Mercy McAuley 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Mercy McAuley | |||||
| Strongsville 4 (2 / 0) - Revere 1 (2 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 51 - 30 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Strongsville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Revere | |||||
| Thomas Worthington 3 (1 / 1) - Delaware Hayes 2 (2 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 58 - 49 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Ursuline Academy 3 (2 / 2) - Sycamore 2 (3 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 35 - 39 O.o.F.: 4-1-3-5-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ursuline Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Westerville Central 3 (3 / 0) - Hilliard Bradley 2 (1 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 45 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Bradley | |||||
| Worthington Christian 4 (2 / 2) - Bexley 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 52 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Bexley | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 3 (3 / 0) - Hilliard Darby 2 (1 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 46 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:
























































