Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 5 (6 / 2) - Medina 0 (1 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 64 - 18 O.o.F.: 4-1-2-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Medina | |||||
| Beachwood 4 (4 / 1) - Chagrin Falls 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 44 - 30 O.o.F.: 2-3-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Chagrin Falls | |||||
| Canal Winchester 4 (3 / 1) - Grove City 1 (1 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 61 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Grove City | |||||
| Centerville 4 (7 / 0) - Springboro 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 57 - 35 O.o.F.: 2-3-4-5-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Springboro | |||||
| Columbus Academy 3 (2 / 0) - Worthington Christian 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 65% # Games: 54 - 29 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Worthington Christian | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 5 (4 / 0) - Franklin Heights 0 (1 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 88% # Games: 60 - 8 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 4 (2 / 3) - Marysville 1 (1 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 71% # Games: 54 - 22 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 5 (1 / 2) - Dublin Scioto 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 81% # Games: 60 - 14 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 4 (3 / 0) - Pickerington Central 1 (0 / 2) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 69% # Games: 59 - 26 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington Central | |||||
| Hilliard Davidson 3 (1 / 2) - Pickerington North 2 (1 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 52 - 44 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Mason 5 (3 / 0) - Princeton 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 60 - 0 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Princeton | |||||
| New Albany 4 (3 / 2) - Olentangy Berlin 1 (2 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 58 - 40 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Ready 3 (3 / 1) - Madison Christian 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 59% # Games: 40 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Ready | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Madison Christian | |||||
| Seven Hills 3 (1 / 1) - Roger Bacon 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 55 - 36 O.o.F.: 1-5-3-2-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Seven Hills | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Roger Bacon | |||||
| St. Joseph Academy 3 (3 / 2) - Twinsburg 2 (0 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 50 - 38 O.o.F.: 5-4-3-1-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Twinsburg | |||||
| St. Ursula Academy 3 (4 / 2) - Seton 2 (1 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 47 - 39 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Seton | |||||
| Sycamore 3 (3 / 1) - Oak Hills 2 (0 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 52 - 43 O.o.F.: 5-1-4-2-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Sycamore | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Oak Hills | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 3 (3 / 0) - Olentangy 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 38 - 27 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:








































