Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avon 3 (12 / 2) - North Canton Hoover 2 (13 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 49 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Avon | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
North Canton Hoover | |||||
| Canal Winchester 5 (8 / 5) - Logan 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 60 - 4 O.o.F.: 1-2-4-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Logan | |||||
| Columbus School For Girls 4 (9 / 2) - Northwestern 0 | Score: 4-0 % Games: 94% # Games: 48 - 3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Northwestern | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 5 (9 / 5) - Aurora 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 82% # Games: 60 - 13 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Aurora | |||||
| Dublin Coffman 4 (4 / 7) - Hilliard Davidson 0 (2 / 8) | Score: 4-0 % Games: 74% # Games: 49 - 17 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hilliard Davidson | |||||
| Magnificat 4 (13 / 4) - Hawken 1 (9 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 55 - 33 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Magnificat | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hawken | |||||
| Massillon Jackson 5 (13 / 1) - Walsh Jesuit 0 (1 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 70% # Games: 66 - 28 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Massillon Jackson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Walsh Jesuit | |||||
| New Albany 5 (11 / 4) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 97% # Games: 60 - 2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Crossing | |||||
| Orange 3 (7 / 2) - Gilmour Academy 2 (3 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 45 - 29 O.o.F.: 5-4-1-3-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Orange | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Gilmour Academy | |||||
| Revere 5 (11 / 5) - Green 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Revere | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Green | |||||
| Thomas Worthington 3 (5 / 6) - Marysville 2 (2 / 11) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 61 - 41 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Western Reserve Academy 5 (12 / 0) - Cathedral Preparatory-PA 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 61% # Games: 69 - 45 O.o.F.: 4-3-5-1-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Cathedral Preparatory-PA | |||||
| Westerville Central 4 (12 / 0) - Gahanna 1 (10 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 63% # Games: 61 - 36 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Gahanna | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:
































