Girls Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
|
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Walnut 5 (8 / 5) - Dublin Scioto 0 (3 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 65% # Games: 65 - 35 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Big Walnut | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Scioto | |||||
| Canal Winchester 3 (8 / 5) - Lancaster 2 (4 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 52% # Games: 49 - 45 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Canal Winchester | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Lancaster | |||||
| Centerville 5 (13 / 1) - Miamisburg 0 (0 / 1) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 98% # Games: 60 - 1 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-2-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Centerville | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Miamisburg | |||||
| Columbus Academy 3 (9 / 1) - Columbus School For Girls 2 (9 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 47% # Games: 51 - 58 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Columbus Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Columbus School For Girls | |||||
| Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 3 (9 / 5) - Walsh Jesuit 2 (1 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 51 - 41 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Walsh Jesuit | |||||
| Delaware Hayes 5 (9 / 7) - Westland 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 85% # Games: 55 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Delaware Hayes | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westland | |||||
| Dublin Jerome 4 (10 / 2) - Olentangy 1 (2 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 60% # Games: 55 - 37 O.o.F.: 3-1-5-3-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Dublin Jerome | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Olentangy | |||||
| Franklin Heights 4 (6 / 4) - Marion-Franklin 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 79% # Games: 48 - 13 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Franklin Heights | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marion-Franklin | |||||
| Gilmour Academy 3 (3 / 2) - Magnificat 2 (13 / 4) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 45 - 32 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Gilmour Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Magnificat | |||||
| Grandview 5 (6 / 4) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 O.o.F.: 1-4-2-3-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Grandview | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Whitehall | |||||
| Hawken 4 (9 / 3) - Beachwood 1 (10 / 3) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 64% # Games: 60 - 34 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-5-4 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hawken | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Beachwood | |||||
| Hilliard Darby 3 (5 / 5) - Thomas Worthington 2 (5 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 49 - 39 O.o.F.: 4-5-3-1-2 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hilliard Darby | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Thomas Worthington | |||||
| Hudson 3 (3 / 0) - St. Joseph Academy 2 (8 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 60% # Games: 48 - 32 O.o.F.: 1-2-3-4-5 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Hudson | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
St. Joseph Academy | |||||
| Mason 5 (14 / 0) - Hamilton 0 (0 / 2) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 87% # Games: 60 - 9 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Mason | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Hamilton | |||||
| New Albany 4 (11 / 4) - Pickerington North 1 (4 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 55 - 24 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
New Albany | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Pickerington North | |||||
| Newark 5 (10 / 1) - Reynoldsburg 0 (3 / 6) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 62% # Games: 65 - 40 O.o.F.: 5-2-4-1-3 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Newark | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Reynoldsburg | |||||
| Olentangy Berlin 5 (10 / 2) - Marysville 0 (2 / 11) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 72% # Games: 58 - 23 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Olentangy Berlin | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Marysville | |||||
| Revere 4 (11 / 5) - Kenston 1 (0 / 1) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 72% # Games: 55 - 21 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Revere | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Kenston | |||||
| Toledo St. Ursula Academy 3 - Notre Dame Academy 2 (7 / 8) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 61% # Games: 59 - 38 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Toledo St. Ursula Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Notre Dame Academy | |||||
| Upper Arlington 5 (7 / 0) - Dublin Coffman 0 (4 / 7) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 86% # Games: 60 - 10 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Upper Arlington | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Dublin Coffman | |||||
| Western Reserve Academy 4 (12 / 0) - Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin 1 (1 / 4) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 75% # Games: 54 - 18 O.o.F.: 3-2-5-4-1 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Western Reserve Academy | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Notre Dame-Cathedral Latin | |||||
| Westerville Central 5 (12 / 0) - Central Crossing 0 (0 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 91% # Games: 60 - 6 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Westerville Central | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Central Crossing | |||||
| Worthington Kilbourne 4 (8 / 4) - Westerville North 1 (0 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 54% # Games: 51 - 44 |
| Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
|
Worthington Kilbourne | |||||
| Results (Winning %) | ||||||
|
Westerville North | |||||
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is:





















































