Boys Daily Tennis Results
View Mode |
|
Line-up View |
Match Results (with W/L records if available) |
% Games Won By Court |
Results |
---|
Avon 4 (13 / 2) - Walsh Jesuit 1 (1 / 6) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 64 - 39 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-4-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Avon | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Walsh Jesuit |
Bellbrook 3 (4 / 6) - Ross 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 54% # Games: 42 - 36 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellbrook | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Ross |
Bellefontaine 4 (12 / 5) - Cedarville 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 59% # Games: 50 - 35 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bellefontaine | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Cedarville |
Bexley 3 (14 / 9) - Upper Arlington 2 (7 / 9) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 53 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Bexley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Upper Arlington |
Centerville 5 (10 / 5) - Miami Valley School 0 (4 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 60 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Centerville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Miami Valley School |
Columbus Academy 3 (15 / 4) - Olentangy 2 (7 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 55 - 42 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Columbus Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Olentangy |
Copley 5 (6 / 7) - Barberton 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 100% # Games: 48 - 0 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Copley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Barberton |
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy 4 (13 / 2) - Western Reserve Academy 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 56% # Games: 66 - 51 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Cuyahoga Valley Christian Academy | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Western Reserve Academy |
Dayton Christian 3 - Chaminade-Julienne 2 (12 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 55% # Games: 66 - 53 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dayton Christian | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chaminade-Julienne |
Delaware Hayes 3 (12 / 4) - Jonathan Alder 2 (16 / 3) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 65 - 52 O.o.F.: 5-1-4-3-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Delaware Hayes | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Jonathan Alder |
DeSales 4 (15 / 2) - Westerville North 1 (7 / 8) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 62% # Games: 51 - 31 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
DeSales | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Westerville North |
Dublin Coffman 3 (9 / 6) - Dublin Jerome 2 (8 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 56% # Games: 55 - 44 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Dublin Coffman | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Jerome |
Franklin Heights 5 (10 / 7) - Whitehall 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 90% # Games: 60 - 7 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Franklin Heights | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Whitehall |
Grandview 5 (4 / 4) - Canal Winchester 0 (3 / 12) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 67% # Games: 61 - 30 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Grandview | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Canal Winchester |
Hawken 5 (8 / 1) - Chagrin Falls 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hawken | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Chagrin Falls |
Hilliard Bradley 5 (4 / 8) - Reynoldsburg 0 (1 / 10) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Hilliard Bradley | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Reynoldsburg |
Lakota East 5 (10 / 4) - Oak Hills 0 (0 / 4) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 75% # Games: 60 - 20 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lakota East | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Oak Hills |
Lexington 5 (14 / 3) - Madison Comprehensive 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 95% # Games: 60 - 3 O.o.F.: 1-3-2-5-4 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Lexington | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Madison Comprehensive |
London 5 (7 / 6) - Tecumseh 0 (0 / 8) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 92% # Games: 60 - 5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
London | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Tecumseh |
Loveland 3 (9 / 9) - Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy 2 (0 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 48% # Games: 46 - 50 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Loveland | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy |
Marysville 3 (9 / 4) - Hilliard Davidson 2 (9 / 7) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 58% # Games: 59 - 43 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Marysville | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hilliard Davidson |
Massillon Jackson 4 (16 / 4) - Glenoak 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 70% # Games: 65 - 28 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Massillon Jackson | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Glenoak |
Monroe 3 - Valley View-B 2 | Score: 3-2 % Games: 66% # Games: 58 - 30 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Monroe | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Valley View-B |
New Albany 5 (13 / 2) - Wellington 0 (3 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 78% # Games: 60 - 17 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
New Albany | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Wellington |
North Royalton 3 (3 / 2) - Solon 2 (6 / 6) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 51% # Games: 50 - 49 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
North Royalton | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Solon |
Oakwood 3 (14 / 2) - Tippecanoe 2 (12 / 5) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 57% # Games: 55 - 41 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Oakwood | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Tippecanoe |
Olentangy Liberty 3 (9 / 5) - Olentangy Orange 2 (12 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 49% # Games: 44 - 46 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Olentangy Liberty | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Olentangy Orange |
Perrysburg 3 (9 / 0) - Sylvania Southview 2 (0 / 1) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 44 - 39 O.o.F.: 1-3-4-5-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Perrysburg | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Sylvania Southview |
Ready 4 (8 / 5) - Hartley 1 (0 / 5) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 67% # Games: 52 - 26 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Ready | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Hartley |
Springboro 5 (12 / 4) - Beavercreek 0 (10 / 3) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 73% # Games: 63 - 23 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Springboro | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Beavercreek |
St. Charles 4 (7 / 7) - Worthington Christian 1 (6 / 12) | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 54 - 28 O.o.F.: 1-4-2-3-5 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
St. Charles | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Worthington Christian |
St. Xavier 3 (17 / 4) - Walnut Hills 2 (2 / 2) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 44 - 39 O.o.F.: 1-5-3-4-2 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
St. Xavier | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Walnut Hills |
Valley View 4 - Waynesville 1 | Score: 4-1 % Games: 66% # Games: 53 - 27 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Valley View | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Waynesville |
Watkins Memorial 5 (15 / 0) - Thomas Worthington 0 (2 / 17) | Score: 5-0 % Games: 84% # Games: 61 - 12 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Watkins Memorial | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Thomas Worthington |
Westerville South 3 (4 / 9) - Dublin Scioto 2 (2 / 13) | Score: 3-2 % Games: 53% # Games: 41 - 37 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Westerville South | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Dublin Scioto |
Wooster 5 (13 / 4) - Archbishop Hoban 0 | Score: 5-0 % Games: 77% # Games: 62 - 19 |
Team Line-ups | Sngl 1 |
Sngl 2 |
Sngl 3 |
Doub 1 |
Doub 2 |
|
Wooster | ||||||
Results (Winning %) | ||||||
Archbishop Hoban |
Frequently Asked Questions:
What is O.o.F? That is the Order of Finish. It is especially popular with college teams to indicate which court (or players) clinched (or secured) the win. As an example, if it was a 3-2 match, the last court to finish "clinched" the match for the winning team. That was the court everyone was watching at the end of the match. This is an optional field that coaches can enter. If your school or coach does not report scores into OhioTennisZone.com, please contact OhioTennisZone.com via Feedback to have your scores included online.
Member is logged in as: - Access level is: